Summary
Open banking regulation in the U.S. is undergoing a major transformation.
A transformative battle is underway in U.S. financial services as stakeholders clash over Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act—commonly known as the CFPB’s open banking rule. Open banking regulation in the U.S.
At the heart of the debate is consumer data ownership. In particular, the key issue is the right to allow third parties—like fintech platforms—to access that data.While in Addition The final rule was issued in October 2024. It codifies these rights and ends outdated practices like screen scraping powerful incumbents are pushing back. Major banks like JPMorgan Chase plan to charge exorbitant access fees. These, combined with legal challenges and regulatory reversals, threaten to unravel the rule’s intent and potential.
This tension exposes a deeper conflict. On one side are entrenched financial institutions. On the other are innovative fintech companies that have rapidly filled service gaps over the past decade. These agile, consumer-centric players, from neobanks to earned wage access platforms, have redefined financial inclusion and accessibility.
However, their future viability is jeopardized if they are priced out of access to the consumer data they rely on to deliver personalized, competitive services. Ironically, the very rule meant to empower consumers is under siege by the very institutions it seeks to regulate.”
Not all banks are resisting change. Many community and regional banks are embracing open banking. They see it as a pathway to innovation, competitive advantage, and long-term survival.. These smaller players are forming strategic partnerships with fintechs, investing in embedded finance, and evolving faster than their “too-big-to-fail” counterparts. The shift marks a clear bifurcation in banking attitudes, between those doubling down on legacy infrastructure and those building for a digital-first future.
This isn’t just a policy debate. It’s a reckoning over who owns financial data and who benefits from it. The outcome will impact not only consumers, but also small businesses that depend on alternative lending models, cash-flow underwriting, and smarter treasury tools. As global markets outpace the U.S. in implementing open finance, the question is no longer if America will catch up, but whether it chooses to lead or fall behind.
Meet the Experts
Phil Goldfeder, CEO of the American FinTech Council (AFC), and Penny Lee, CEO of the Financial Technology Association (FTA), are two of the most influential voices advocating for responsible financial innovation in the U.S. Both bring deep expertise in regulation, consumer financial rights, and the fintech ecosystem. Their nuanced understanding of Section 1033 and active role in legal and policy discussions make their insights foundational for navigating the future of open banking.
The Big Idea
Open banking is not a threat, it’s a catalyst for democratizing financial access. But as the long-anticipated CFPB rule finally gains traction, regulatory uncertainty and aggressive resistance from large banks could undermine its promise. At stake is the consumer’s right to permission their own financial data, a right that underpins innovation, competition, and financial health. The current battle over data access fees and liability frameworks reveals a classic “innovator’s dilemma:” fintech insurgents championing transparency versus incumbents protecting legacy revenue streams.
Key Takeaways
- Consumers Own Their Data: The core of Section 1033 affirms that financial data belongs to consumers, who have the right to share it with trusted agents or platforms.
- FinTech Innovation is Under Threat: Exorbitant access fees from major banks could dismantle the revenue models of fintech aggregators, pushing the ecosystem back toward risky practices like AI-assisted screen scraping.
- Collaboration, Not Combat, Is the Way Forward: Many community and regional banks are thriving through fintech partnerships, proving that open banking and financial institutions can co-exist.
- Global Models Offer a Blueprint: Countries like the UK, Singapore, and Brazil are far ahead in implementing seamless, secure open finance systems that enhance competition and reduce fraud.
- Small Businesses Are Stakeholders Too: Beyond individual consumers, small and mid-sized businesses rely heavily on open banking for better underwriting, cash flow insights, and financial agility.
Tools, Strategies, or Frameworks Mentioned
- Section 1033 of Dodd-Frank: A legal provision ensuring consumers can grant their financial data to third parties. The final rule attempts to replace outdated screen scraping methods with secure APIs.
- Permissioned Data Framework: A regulatory model that enables consumers to grant explicit access to their financial data for tools that enhance budgeting, lending, and investment services.
- Earned Wage Access (EWA) and Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL): Examples of consumer-first fintech models that challenge traditional banking margins and require real-time data access to operate effectively.
- Embedded Finance: Increasingly adopted by community banks, this strategy integrates financial services into non-financial platforms to enhance user experience and expand service offerings.
Final Thoughts
“No bank has a guaranteed future. Over the long run, open wins, innovation wins, and choice wins.” — J.P. Nichols
The fight for open banking is far from over, but its stakes are crystal clear: a fair, inclusive, and competitive financial ecosystem hinges on the ability of consumers to control their own data. Fintech innovators and forward-looking banks are ready to meet that challenge, now the question is whether regulators and incumbents will enable it or obstruct it. Either way, consumers won’t wait. They’re already choosing apps and services that work for them. The future of finance will be permissioned, or it won’t be at all.
Full Transcript
Want fintech & banking insights every week?
Subscribe to The Provoke.fm Briefing
Listen and subscribe to Breaking Banks on your favorite platform
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel
Visit us